Discover the legacy of Justice A.K. Mathur, chairman of 7th Pay Commission. Learn about key recommendations, salary changes, and the reforms that continue to shape government pay and pensions in India today.
In February 2014, the Government of India appointed Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur as the Chairman of the 7th Pay Commission, marking the start of a crucial review of central government salaries, pensions, and allowances.
The commission’s work shaped the pay structure for over 47 lakh government employees and 52 lakh pensioners, influencing both financial planning and employee morale for years to come. This article examines the chairman’s role, the commission’s composition, and the far-reaching effects of its recommendations.
Who Was the Chairman of the 7th Pay Commission?
Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur, a retired Supreme Court judge, was chosen to head the 7th Central Pay Commission. Before this appointment, he served as the Chairman of the Armed Forces Tribunal, where he handled sensitive defence-related cases. His judicial background and experience in public service made him a logical choice to oversee one of India’s most significant salary revisions in decades.
The official Press Information Bureau notification confirmed his appointment, detailing the commission’s mandate and members. Justice Mathur’s leadership was critical in balancing the expectations of employees with the fiscal discipline required by the government.
Appointment and Tenure
The 7th Central Pay Commission was constituted on 25 September 2013, with the Terms of Reference (ToR) formally issued in early 2014. Justice Mathur’s role as chairman began in February 2014, and the commission was given 18 months to submit its report.
Here is a quick overview of key dates:
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| Constitution of 7th CPC | 25 September 2013 |
| Chairman appointed | February 2014 |
| Report submission | 19 November 2015 |
| Implementation begins | 1 January 2016 |
The full commission comprised Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur (Chairman), Vivek Rae (full-time member), Dr. Rathin Roy (part-time member), and Meena Agarwal (Secretary). The government’s official Department of Expenditure portal still archives these details for public reference.
Composition and Mandate of the Commission
When the Government of India set up the Seventh Central Pay Commission, the objective was clear: review the existing pay structure and recommend a modern, rationalised system of pay, allowances, and pensions for central government employees and pensioners. The commission was chaired by Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur — the chairman of 7th pay commission — and included a small team of full-time and part-time members chosen for their administrative, economic and judicial experience.
Key components of the commission’s mandate (Terms of Reference) included:
- Revising the pay structure to ensure fairness across services and cadres.
- Examining allowances and proposing rationalisation and simplification.
- Recommending changes to pension and retirement benefits consistent with fiscal sustainability.
- Making proposals that harmonise civilian and defence pay-related concerns where appropriate.
The official repository for the commission’s documents — including the full report, the resolution, and implementation orders — is maintained by the Department of Expenditure. You can access the complete report and implementation material directly from the Central Pay Commission section on the Department of Expenditure portal. For researchers and pensioners, the full Seventh Central Pay Commission report in English (PDF) is also available for download.
Key Recommendations — What the Commission Proposed
The recommendations submitted by the chairman of 7th pay commission and the panel were wide-ranging. Below are the most consequential, presented with a focus on practical effect and clarity.
1. Introduction of a Pay Matrix (A Simple, Level-Based Structure)
The commission replaced the older pay band + grade pay structure with a single consolidated Pay Matrix. The matrix introduced pay levels (ranging roughly from Level 1 for entry-level posts to Level 18 for the very highest civil posts), with fixed increments between successive cells in each level. This removed ambiguous grade-pay calculations and made pay fixation and career progression more transparent.
2. Minimum and Maximum Pay Bands
The commission recommended a new minimum pay and revised maxima for higher levels. Implementation saw the effective minimum central pay increase, with the government fixing it from 1 January 2016. For exact figures and the complete pay matrix table, you can refer to the 7th CPC report available on the Pensioners’ Portal (PDF) and the Implementation Cell notifications.
3. Rationalisation of AllowancesA major thrust of the commission was to rationalise the complex array of allowances. Some were recommended for merger or abolition, while others were retained but recalibrated. To study these recommendations in detail, refer to the Committee on Allowances report published by the Department of Expenditure (PDF).
4. Pensions and Family Pension
Pension fixation formulas were revised to align with the new pay matrix. The commission recommended clear guidelines for pensioners’ pay fixation, family pension calculations and re-fixation where needed, aiming to minimise ambiguities that previously plagued implementation.
5. Defence Forces and Special Considerations
Defence-related pay and allowances remained a sensitive area. While the commission made several recommendations for risk and hardship allowances, some defence stakeholders pressed for separate treatment on issues like Non-Functional Upgradation and One Rank One Pension (OROP). These debates persisted in post-report implementation phases and were discussed in government responses and parliamentary answers.
Quick Comparison Table — Old Structure vs. 7th CPC Structure
| Aspect | Pre-7CPC (Grade Pay Model) | Post-7CPC (Pay Matrix Model) |
|---|---|---|
| Pay fixation mechanics | Pay Band + Grade Pay + Increment | Single Pay Matrix level with cell-wise increments |
| Transparency | Complex calculations, multiple allowances | Simplified levels; clearer career progression |
| Allowances | Large number of separate allowances | Rationalisation, some allowances merged/abolished |
| Pension fixation | Based on older pay bands | Reworked to align with pay matrix and new rules |
Implementation and Timeline
The recommendations of the chairman of 7th pay commission and his team were formally accepted by the Union Cabinet on 29 June 2016. The changes were implemented with effect from 1 January 2016, meaning all eligible employees and pensioners were entitled to revised salaries and pensions from that date.
One of the notable features of this implementation was the prompt payment of arrears. Unlike previous commissions where arrears were staggered over months or even years, the 7th CPC arrears were credited in a single instalment within the same financial year. This decision was welcomed by employees as it provided immediate relief and liquidity.
The Ministry of Finance issued detailed implementation orders through the Department of Expenditure, covering pay fixation, allowances, and pension adjustments. These orders also included annexures with the full pay matrix for different levels and cadres.
Key Implementation Milestones
| Milestone | Date | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Union Cabinet approval | 29 June 2016 | Formal acceptance of recommendations |
| Effective date | 1 January 2016 | All revised pay, pension, and allowances applied retrospectively |
| Arrears payment | August 2016 | Entire arrears credited in one instalment |
| Allowances revision notification | 6 July 2017 | Implementation of revised allowances based on committee review |
For a detailed breakdown of the Cabinet decision, the official Press Information Bureau release remains a primary source.
Impact on Salaries and Pensions
The pay matrix introduced under the leadership of the chairman of 7th pay commission simplified salary structures and provided a predictable progression path. It allowed employees to see their entire career’s pay levels in one consolidated table, which improved transparency and reduced disputes during promotions.
Salary Impact Example (Central Secretariat Service, Level 7):
- Old Pay (Pre-2016): ₹46,100 (Pay Band 2 with Grade Pay ₹4,600)
- New Pay (Post-2016): ₹62,200 (Level 7, Cell 1 in Pay Matrix)
- Difference: ₹16,100 monthly increase, excluding allowances.
Pension Impact:
The pension revision formula linked directly to the pay matrix meant that pre-2016 retirees saw an automatic upward revision of their pensions without having to individually appeal for parity. This adjustment was critical for harmonising benefits across different retirement years.
Why the Implementation Was Considered Smoother Than Past Commissions
Several factors contributed to a relatively smoother roll-out:
- The consolidated pay matrix avoided grade pay anomalies common in earlier systems.
- Faster arrears settlement reduced administrative backlogs.
- Online publication of orders, FAQs, and calculators on official portals made information accessible to employees and pensioners.
- Separate handling of allowances allowed the government to negotiate contentious elements without delaying the core pay revision.
Long-Term Significance and Ongoing Relevance
Even years after its implementation, the work led by the chairman of 7th pay commission continues to influence India’s public sector compensation policies. The pay matrix framework introduced in 2016 remains the foundation for salary, pension, and allowance calculations, and is still referenced in notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance and other government bodies.
One of the main reasons for its lasting relevance is that the structure was designed to be future-proof. Instead of revising grade pays or introducing complex formulas every few years, the government can simply update the fitment factor or adjust levels in the matrix when needed, making subsequent changes smoother.
Influence on State Governments and PSUs
After the central government accepted the 7th CPC recommendations, several state governments and public sector undertakings adopted similar frameworks for their employees. States such as Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra issued notifications aligning their pay scales with the central matrix. This not only simplified payroll processing but also reduced disparities between state and central employees performing similar roles.
Addressing Post-Implementation Anomalies
Following the rollout, an Anomalies Committee was set up to address concerns raised by employee associations. Key issues included:
- Parity in pay between different cadres performing comparable work.
- Clarification on pension calculations for pre-2016 retirees.
- Demands for higher minimum pay than the ₹18,000 initially recommended.
The official resolutions and anomaly reports are available for public view on the Pensioners’ Portal, which also provides circulars explaining revisions for pensioners affected by these changes.
Continuing Debates: Defence Pay, OROP, and NFU
Defence personnel pay and pension remain a subject of ongoing discussion. While the 7th CPC incorporated the One Rank One Pension (OROP) principle into its broader recommendations, there were disagreements over the method of calculation and periodicity of revision. Additionally, the Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU) policy, which allows officers in certain services to get pay parity with IAS counterparts after a set period, saw partial acceptance and continues to be debated in policy forums.
Snapshot: Why the 7th CPC Still Matters in 2025
| Aspect | Current Status | Link to 7th CPC Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Pay Matrix | Still in use for all central government employees | Levels & cells as introduced in 2016 |
| Dearness Allowance | Updated twice yearly | Based on 7th CPC base index |
| Pension Revision | Automatically aligned to pay matrix | Same formula as recommended |
| Allowances | Periodically revised | Structure from 7th CPC retained |
The foundation laid under the leadership of the chairman of 7th pay commission is expected to remain in place until the 8th Pay Commission eventually re-examines the system. Even then, the innovations of 2016 will likely shape the next set of reforms, as they provided a blueprint for balancing fairness, simplicity, and fiscal responsibility.
Conclusion: Legacy and the Road Ahead
The role of the chairman of 7th pay commission was not merely administrative; it reshaped the pay and pension structure for millions of individuals across India. By introducing the Pay Matrix, simplifying pension calculations, and streamlining allowances, Justice A.K. Mathur and his team set a precedent for transparency and efficiency in government compensation systems.
In the years since, the framework has proven adaptable. Regular updates to Dearness Allowance based on inflation, along with periodic revisions of allowances, have ensured that the system remains relevant without requiring a complete overhaul every few years. The official updates are consistently published by the Press Information Bureau and the Department of Personnel and Training, offering employees and pensioners a reliable reference point.
Anticipation of the 8th Pay Commission
While no formal notification has yet been issued, discussions around the 8th Pay Commission are beginning to surface in policy and employee circles. It is expected that any future commission will build on the principles established by the 7th CPC—namely simplicity, fairness, and fiscal prudence—while integrating technology for faster implementation.
Key expectations from the next pay commission include:
- Enhanced digital pay management systems.
- More flexible allowances that adapt to remote and hybrid working models.
- Closer alignment between public sector and private sector compensation trends.
Why the 7th CPC Framework Will Continue to Matter
Even after a new commission is eventually constituted, the legacy of the 7th CPC will endure. The pay matrix, as a structural concept, is likely to remain the backbone of government compensation. Moreover, the shift towards fewer, rationalised allowances has already reduced administrative burden and improved transparency for employees.
| Key Reform by 7th CPC | Ongoing Benefit |
|---|---|
| Pay Matrix | Easy to update and understand |
| Fitment Factor | Transparent pension and pay revisions |
| Rationalised Allowances | Reduced complexity and disputes |
| Separate Defence Pay Structure | Tailored approach to armed forces needs |
Final Word
The work of the chairman of 7th pay commission marked a defining chapter in India’s administrative reforms. It struck a balance between improving employee welfare and maintaining government budgetary discipline. As discussions on the next pay commission gain momentum, the 7th CPC will remain both a reference point and a benchmark for fair, efficient, and sustainable pay policy.
For government employees, pensioners, and policy observers, understanding this legacy is essential—not just to appreciate past reforms, but to prepare for the decisions that will shape the next phase of public sector compensation in India.
FAQ
Who was the chairman of 7th Pay Commission?
Justice A.K. Mathur served as the chairman of 7th Pay Commission, leading reforms in government pay, pensions, and allowances.
When was the 7th Pay Commission implemented?
The 7th Pay Commission recommendations were implemented from January 1, 2016, with financial benefits effective from the same date.
What were the key recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission?
Major recommendations included a simplified pay matrix, rationalised allowances, higher pensions, and a fitment factor of 2.57.
How did the 7th Pay Commission impact pensions?
It introduced a uniform fitment factor for pensions, ensuring transparency and fair increases for all retired employees.
Will there be an 8th Pay Commission?
As of now, no official announcement has been made. However, discussions suggest it may follow a similar framework with updated reforms.
Please do not enter any spam link in comment box. Thank you!